Answers · Campaigns

How do candidates win over rural voters versus city voters?

By Mert Yerekapan, maker of Midterms 2026 · Updated 2026-10-28

They use different playbooks because the places work differently. Rural outreach leans on showing up in person, local trust and issues tied to daily life, like jobs, distance and services. City outreach leans on density, organization and reaching many different communities at once.

Reaching rural voters

Rural areas are spread out, so every visit costs time. Many have fewer media outlets, more local newspapers and radio, and strong community ties.

What tends to work:

Reaching city voters

Cities pack many people into a small area, which makes outreach cheaper per voter. But cities aren't a single group. They contain neighborhoods, professions, age groups and communities with different priorities.

What tends to work:

What they have in common

In both places, people respond to candidates who seem to understand their daily life. A canned speech doesn't work anywhere. I think the biggest mistake is treating either group as one bloc with one set of views, because rural and urban areas each contain real variety.

What I'd do

I'd adapt the format and keep the sincerity the same. In the country, I'd spend more time in person and rely on local messengers. In a city, I'd lean on organization and many smaller conversations.

That contrast is built into Midterms 2026, a free iPhone game I made. When you hold a rally in a state, you pick an act that fits the crowd. A tractor works in farm country, a rap song works in the city. Pick the right act for the place and it pays off, and the wrong one falls flat. It's a simple way to see why the same pitch can't work everywhere.

Related questions